by the stash, for the stash

Guest Information

Reviewstash isn't just another technology review website - it's your review website! Registered members can submit reviews to be featured on the home page, participate in contests, and ask questions in the forums - register today to get started! Registration also removes interstitial ads.
  • Forum
  •  » Reviews
  •  » Kingston ValueRAM KVR800D2 2GB DDR2 PC2-6400
Topic rating: 1

#1 8/02/11 2:05 PM

sdm's Avatar
sdm United States
Gender: male
From: California
Registered: 12/08/07
Posts: 7781
Karma: 84
Note: Border Zoned
Reputation :   173 

Tags: [ddr2, kingston, ram]
For most hardware enthusiasts and computer gamers, DDR2 is an almost forgotten term - a relic of a bygone era. Yet, contrary to what most see as the standard, many people still rely on DDR2 product for their computers, servers, home theaters, and workstations. DDR2 is a staple of many popular, small form factor, motherboards, making it still very relevant and important. Unfortunately, many manufacturers have given up the ghost when it comes to producing DDR2 product. Thankfully, there is still a hearty used market for DDR2 product and many memory companies are still producing "budget" or "value" DDR2 products. Today, we are going to be taking a look at one such product - the Kingston 2GB DDR2 stick. Clocked at 800 MHz and available for an affordable price, it looks like a solid product. Let's see, however, how it stacks up against a popular old, second-hand DDR2 product from OCZ.

Specifications / Features:

800MHz DDR2
SPD Programmed at 6-6-6-18 (CAS-TRCD-TRP-TRAS)
Unbuffered Long DIMM
Kingston Lifetime Warranty
Rated Working Voltage at 1.8 volts
240 Pin DDR2 Memory Modules
Kingston's ValueRAM Info Site
$22.99 @ Amazon

The Packaging:
Kingston decided to opt for the most painful plastic blister packaging known to mankind. Their packaging designer seems to be somewhat sadistic; they put the memory stick in absolute clear sight, without any logical way to extract said stick. Instead of doing the terrible job my x-acto knife and I performed to the front of the packaging, you'd like to think that it would be possible to use a scissor along the sides. Unfortunately, the plastic folds in too tightly for you to safely extract the memory via that sane method. I recommend you use a pair of strong, sturdy scissors and cut, with the scissor at the fulcrum, around the black memory holder - that should do the trick. And, in the future, I really hope that Kingston figures out how to package products using a scissor-free, plastic enclosure (see my Avexir review for an example of memory packaging done correctly).

The Kingston DDR2 Stick Itself:
(Click images to increase size)

The memory comes with Kingston's own in-house modules. And, unfortunately, I am not able to determine anything regarding the quality or die process of these particular modules - the serial numbers yield no useful information. Everything is well laid out on the circuit and all of the gold contacts arrived well coated; manufacturing wise, there seems to be nothing to complain about. Separate from the actual testing, I ran two different packs of these memory sticks under Memtest86+ and discovered no errors. Hopefully that means that most of these ValueRAM sticks are rather reliable. At first I was somewhat disappointed that Kingston did not include a heat spreader with these modules. Especially considering how ridiculously hot other sticks like the OCZ Gold and the Kingston HyperX DDR2 seem to get. But, it seems like however Kingston manufactured the ValueRAM, they can easily handle low voltage. They always stay relatively cool, even during overclocking, never getting too hot to touch. Which means these should work great in small home theater builds and RAM filled home servers. I suppose it might be the fact that, with slower timings, these don't secretly require 2.1~2.2 volts like other DDR2 products often do (especially OCZ memory), but instead only require the JEDEC specification of 1.8 volts.


For testing, I used the latest version of one of the newest benchmarking applications, AIDA64; the evolution of Everest. The testing rig is as follows and mimics what might be seen in an ultra-budget DDR2 build:

Processor: AMD Athlon II X2 250 @ 3.0 GHz
Motherboard: Biostar TA760G M2+
Video Card: nVidia 7600 GS (old, but mimics low-power discrete graphics)

To test, I compared the Kingston ValueRAM against one of the easiest to find, used DDR2 products out there on the docks of the electronic bay and on Craigslist - the OCZ Gold Edition OCZ2G8002G 2GB DDR2 PC2-6400 stick (information page here). It's more of an enthusiast item, with an "XTC" heat spreader and timings of 5-5-5-15 (CAS-TRCD-TRP-TRAS). But, considering you can easily find this item for around $25~30 locally, it seems like a logical comparison to make. Before we get into the performance indicators, I thought I'd briefly mention overclocking. I wouldn't particularly recommend overclocking these memory modules. I had no luck improving the latency timings, but I was able to easily increase the speed of the modules a little above 900 MHz by bumping the voltage up to 1.9 volts. So, if you're overclocking your processor, you shouldn't have too much difficulty gaining more headroom via the memory. The OCZ gold, however, proved to be much easier to overclock, but without adequate cooling, the high voltage caused issues in my silent server case - making stability versus performance versus sound levels a major balancing act. Now, onto the performance markers.
In terms of read and write bandwidth, the OCZ Gold and Kingston ValueRAM are roughly ~99.6% within the same performance level - the OCZ Gold just slightly edging out the Kingston memory in terms of read bandwidth. In terms of memory copy operations, however, the Kingston memory is the clear winner, with the two sticks being ~98.2% similar. I ran the benchmark multiple times to confirm, this must mean that Kingston isn't simple recycling old technology, but has improved upon and made their DDR2 product more efficient that we've seen in the past. Those copy cycles will come in handy for most users running memory intensive server applications.
A lot of fast computer games rely on memory latency to push extreme frame rates, so the slight edge that the OCZ memory has over the ValueRAM, in terms of stable timings, will definitely result in the OCZ having 1~2% more frames-per-second over the ValueRAM. Five or so frames per second might be important to a hardcore gamer, but for most users, the latency difference shouldn't be particularly relevant. Overall, however, the Kingston budget memory managed to keep up, considering the inferior timings, and the OCZ Gold originally being expensive enthusiast RAM.


If overclocking isn't a primary concern, and it shouldn't be for most current DDR2 users, then you'd be foolish to purchase a second-hand enthusiast DDR2 kit for 5~10 dollars more than Kingston's ValueRAM product. The read/write/copy performance is more than satisfactory and, considering the inferior timings, latency differences are particularly noticeable. Most importantly, for the end-user, Kingston's product stays incredibly cool, runs infinitely more stable than old, enthusiast DDR2, and needs minimal voltage to function. Not only that, but they also offer this item in a low-profile form factor and include a lifetime warranty, factors that make Kingston the definite choice for older memory products.

Incredibly stable
Runs cool; requires minimal voltage
Relatively inexpensive for DDR2; readily available
Impressive copy bandwidth

Neutral Ground:
Packaging is atrocious

Doesn't overclock particularly well - especially in the timings department


8/02/11 2:05 PM

Advertisement Bot

#2 9/29/17 10:28 PM

Ivanuoig's Avatar
Ivanuoig Bulgaria
Gender: male
From: Bulgaria
Registered: 9/20/17
Posts: 6
Karma: 0
Reputation :   

I can not take part now in discussion - it is very occupied. But I will soon necessarily write that I think.


#3 9/29/17 11:43 PM

Gregehxz's Avatar
Gregehxz Bulgaria
Gender: male
From: Bulgaria
Registered: 9/21/17
Posts: 5
Karma: 0
Reputation :   

Another great review  I learned a bunch from your conclusions about the JEDEC standards and the role they play. 

To answer your question I dont think it should be branded HyperX, but still looks like great memory

I cant recall any memory from Kingston being bad


#4 10/02/17 1:35 PM

Philqyha's Avatar
Philqyha Bulgaria
Gender: male
From: Bulgaria
Registered: 9/21/17
Posts: 4
Karma: 0
Reputation :   

I didnt try to hack into it, however I did talk to Kingston about it, and what I had seen on previous attempts to this type of security / "encryption".  Mostly where the keypad was more of an On/Off switch for the USB connection.  Kingston said the encryption is built into the memory, so where previous versions by other manufacturers you could jumper the chips and bypass the "encryption" they said its not possible with this one.

As for being able to bypass the PIN and using it as a plain flash drive, if what Kingston said about the encryption being built into the memory is accurate, you couldnt bypass the PIN to use it as a plain flash drive.


#5 10/09/17 6:27 PM

Fredlwyhk's Default Avatar
Fredlwyhk Bulgaria
Gender: male
From: Bulgaria
Registered: 9/19/17
Posts: 6
Karma: 0
Reputation :   

Kingston and I have been talking a bunch in the recent weeks and I am happy to announce that they have begun using Hynix ICs on their DDR500 memory modules  This is a smart move on their end and puts them back in competition with Corsair XMS 4000 and others. 

To break even more news we have learned today that Kingston is also thinking of releasing a Reg DDR400 TSOP HyperX module The module is in testing right now.   

Kingston is making some smart moves on their HyperX line


#6 10/10/17 1:52 AM

Jasoncena's Default Avatar
Registered: 10/09/17
Posts: 1
Karma: 0
Reputation :   

I need some feedback

On the other hand this product comes with the HyperX name and I am confused how this product got the HyperX name. Kingston began offering the HyperX memory line for gaming enthusiasts and I in no way see how their DDR400 Registered Memory Module this fits in this category. It can be clearly seen that the TSOP design produces a faster memory module and since gamers are wanting the best, how is this gamers memory? Sure the Athlon 64 FX processor is designed for gamers and enthusiasts, but just because a memory module works on it doesnt mean it should be branded gamers memory Gamers really hate having high latencies 3-3-3, but that made sense when we found out that timings of 3-3-3 are the JEDEC specification for Registered ECC DDR400 modules Sadly it was JEDEC standards and not gamers that this HyperX module was built around.

  • Forum
  •  » Reviews
  •  » Kingston ValueRAM KVR800D2 2GB DDR2 PC2-6400

Board footer

Optimized for 1280x1024 @ 32 bit
Fueled by FluxBB
Top 20 Posts
Who's Online
Index Map
About Us